(Well, not quite. It's more like the rantings and random thoughts of a mother of three who is trying to have another baby while also juggling all that life has to offer.)
Showing posts with label Random Thoughts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Random Thoughts. Show all posts
Friday, December 16, 2011
Wordle of My Blog
Here is a wordle I created by entering my blog URL. I love wordles because it shows patterns in language, and I believe language is so important. Language not only reflects our thoughts and state of mind, but shapes it as well. Want to change your outlook on life? Pay very close attention to the words you choose and choose more positive, less extreme words and phrases. I have often noticed that people who speak in extremes often see the world as black and white. This may not be bad if you are in the white, but what happens when you fall into the black? If you want to challenge yourself, take recent emails to friends, facebook pages, or journal writings and enter into a wordle program and see what you come up with. What do your word choices look like? How are your words impacting your outlook on life? How is it impacting your ability to move forward and make the most of life?
Recently my struggles with IVF, infertility and miscarriage have dominated my blog and the language reflects those topics. I sat for a minute and thought carefully on my wordle. There are a lot of emotions in my writing of hope, sadness and possibility. I do a lot of thinking, writing, and feeling. There weren't any words like "give up", "dejected", "hopeless." While this period in my life is most certainly marked with sadness, frustration, and medical treatments, I continue to have words of positivity, family, and goodness. This gives me perspective and helps me see that I am able to be more than this fight for a fourth child. I am full of life, full of heart, full of family, full of possibility. I am. (and that is all I need to be).
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
Murder with No Permant Consequences
This morning on the Today Show, there was a story about a woman who was denied a hearing to review shared custody of her children. Her request came after she learned that her ex-husband married a woman convicted of killing her children twenty years ago. Five years ago, the woman’s psychiatrist was so concerned about her mental stability, he reported her to the Department of Social Services. When reviewing the mother’s plea to have the custody revised so that her children would not be in harm’s way, the stance of the court was that this woman had not hurt anyone in five years and appeared to be mentally stable; therefore, the children should be allowed to reside with her.
Given my own history with the court system, custody cases, and DSS, and given my position as a psychologist, I was profoundly sad and angry when I first watched the story. I was outraged at the court’s ignorance in making a statement that since this woman had not hurt someone since 2008, she is safe. She has a history of murder and violence; the best predictor of future violence is past violence. A perfectly capable and loving mother, one who hasn't killed anyone, is able and available to care for the children full time and yet the court did not even hear her plea. I walked away from the television muttering to myself in a fit of fury.
Then I paused to think more deeply on the subject of why we have such a forgiving court system. Forgiveness is comforting to us. We understand that we are human, and as such, have proclivity to imperfection. It makes us nervous to think that we could permanently damage our lives besed on one moment of weakness, carelessness, or stupidity. We find comfort in the idea of second chances, mulligans, and do-overs. While we seemed outraged at cases like Casey Anthony, inside we are secretly relieved that if such a thing happened in our lives, we might have a chance to walk free. We are comforted in knowing that if something unfortunate happens, we have a chance at redemption.
If a person commits one bad act and thereby internalizes the act as a sign they are a bad person, they are more likely to engage in more bad actions. By giving second chances and showing mercy and forgiveness, we decrease the likelihood of future acts of that person. Also, given that our judicial system is imperfect, having softness in the system allows for self-correction. The counterpoint is that such decisions send a message to the greater community that these behaviors have a certain level of acceptability.
While I certainly believe in second chances, I feel that we have to be careful of the messages we are sending. A cute white woman kills her baby, a football star kills his wife, a famous athlete beats his girlfriend, a famous rockstar sets her boyfriend's house on fire...and we forgive it all...and they make money from the story. The nameless, poor, and minority committing the same crimes receive much more severe consequences. It sends a confusing message, thereby weakening our faith in the judicial system. Of further detriment is our sensationalization of violence; it is dangerous and unhealthy to our larger society. We have to be careful about sending a message that no action has a permanent consequence or that every behavior comes with an excuse or a payout. I am not suggesting the shaming or dehumanizing of the guilty; I am suggesting that accountability and retribution be a stronger part of our vocabulary.
When we make everything forgivable, in essence, we forgive the action before it occurs and thereby give a certain level of permission for such behaviors. We can’t forgive abuse or hate crimes or violence. These actions have permanent consequences on the victims, and therefore should also incur permanent consequences on the perpetrator. Casey Anthony shouldn’t make a million dollars for killing her child. OJ Simpson should never have gotten a publishing deal for a book outlining how he would have killed his wife, if he really did it. In the case on the Today show this morning, murdering your own children should prevent you from ever having custody of children. In order to protect our sense of civics and our society as a whole, we have to be sending stronger, more consistent messages about how we will manage the most unforgivable crimes. It’s a sad day when murder of the innocent no longer has permanent consequences on those responsible.
Given my own history with the court system, custody cases, and DSS, and given my position as a psychologist, I was profoundly sad and angry when I first watched the story. I was outraged at the court’s ignorance in making a statement that since this woman had not hurt someone since 2008, she is safe. She has a history of murder and violence; the best predictor of future violence is past violence. A perfectly capable and loving mother, one who hasn't killed anyone, is able and available to care for the children full time and yet the court did not even hear her plea. I walked away from the television muttering to myself in a fit of fury.
Then I paused to think more deeply on the subject of why we have such a forgiving court system. Forgiveness is comforting to us. We understand that we are human, and as such, have proclivity to imperfection. It makes us nervous to think that we could permanently damage our lives besed on one moment of weakness, carelessness, or stupidity. We find comfort in the idea of second chances, mulligans, and do-overs. While we seemed outraged at cases like Casey Anthony, inside we are secretly relieved that if such a thing happened in our lives, we might have a chance to walk free. We are comforted in knowing that if something unfortunate happens, we have a chance at redemption.
If a person commits one bad act and thereby internalizes the act as a sign they are a bad person, they are more likely to engage in more bad actions. By giving second chances and showing mercy and forgiveness, we decrease the likelihood of future acts of that person. Also, given that our judicial system is imperfect, having softness in the system allows for self-correction. The counterpoint is that such decisions send a message to the greater community that these behaviors have a certain level of acceptability.
While I certainly believe in second chances, I feel that we have to be careful of the messages we are sending. A cute white woman kills her baby, a football star kills his wife, a famous athlete beats his girlfriend, a famous rockstar sets her boyfriend's house on fire...and we forgive it all...and they make money from the story. The nameless, poor, and minority committing the same crimes receive much more severe consequences. It sends a confusing message, thereby weakening our faith in the judicial system. Of further detriment is our sensationalization of violence; it is dangerous and unhealthy to our larger society. We have to be careful about sending a message that no action has a permanent consequence or that every behavior comes with an excuse or a payout. I am not suggesting the shaming or dehumanizing of the guilty; I am suggesting that accountability and retribution be a stronger part of our vocabulary.
When we make everything forgivable, in essence, we forgive the action before it occurs and thereby give a certain level of permission for such behaviors. We can’t forgive abuse or hate crimes or violence. These actions have permanent consequences on the victims, and therefore should also incur permanent consequences on the perpetrator. Casey Anthony shouldn’t make a million dollars for killing her child. OJ Simpson should never have gotten a publishing deal for a book outlining how he would have killed his wife, if he really did it. In the case on the Today show this morning, murdering your own children should prevent you from ever having custody of children. In order to protect our sense of civics and our society as a whole, we have to be sending stronger, more consistent messages about how we will manage the most unforgivable crimes. It’s a sad day when murder of the innocent no longer has permanent consequences on those responsible.
Monday, August 1, 2011
Orioles Magic, Will it Happen?

Thursday, July 28, 2011
Taking the Cuts
I have just returned from having two moles biopsied. It isn’t my favorite thing to do, but given that I love being in the sun and I don’t want to die of cancer, I’ll take the cuts. Of course, I scheduled my appointment after returning from a week at the beach. As I try to adjust the paper towel covering me, the male nurse notices my bathing suit marks and says, “Nice tan.” He doesn’t have any tone to his voice, but the effect is the same. I know it is ridiculous to be sitting in a room waiting to have pre-cancerous moles removed with a savage tan, but it seems par for the course for me. A few years ago, I would have rushed to provide a whole slew of excuses. Now, I just shrug it off and save my breath. He doesn’t care. He isn’t the one sitting on the table. I’m the idiot here, not him. The doctor asks me if I reapply sunscreen every two hours. Again, I could lie, but I don’t. She tells me my honesty is refreshing. Her approval of my honesty is the highlight of my visit. Before I know what is happening, she shoves a needle in my neck like I am James Bond and she is the evil doctor charged with taking me down. While I am still trying to figure out if she killed me, she takes to my skin with a doll size biscuit cutter. She takes off two moles-one on my neck and one on my chest. As she is stitching up the big hole in my chest, she says to the male nurse, “see how much easier it is to close it up when there is a flat surface.” Ouch. That stings. I have never been chesty, but really, "flat surface?" Was that really necessary? It is a sad day in a woman’s life when her neck officially has more curves than her chest.
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Love Is...
Love isn’t a feeling or a passion, it’s a series of small actions shared between two people. It isn’t big events or grand gestures, but the things that happen in the little spaces, the small breaths, the silent seconds of every day.
Good love knits together these actions and these moments into a tight weave, folding the fabric back on itself time and time again until a thick quilt is formed, creating a cocoon for those wrapped inside. It offers protection, warmth, safety, comfort.
Bad love tries desperately to string together a series of big actions using big looping stitches, trying to shortcut and ignore the strength of the small stitch. The knots and stitches are loose, lumpy, and uneven. In the end, there isn’t a fabric but more of a moth-eaten bit of cheese cloth. Those that have woven this fabric foolishly think no one sees the holes. When others aren't looking, they pull and tug, stretch and fluff, desperately trying to smooth over, plump,and brighten the coarse bits of fray. They try to wrap themselves, but find only a fight with the other for warmth and protection. When one wins, the other loses. The fabric isn’t big enough for both. Both are left bitter, cold, shivering,and exposed to the elements.
Good love knits together these actions and these moments into a tight weave, folding the fabric back on itself time and time again until a thick quilt is formed, creating a cocoon for those wrapped inside. It offers protection, warmth, safety, comfort.
Bad love tries desperately to string together a series of big actions using big looping stitches, trying to shortcut and ignore the strength of the small stitch. The knots and stitches are loose, lumpy, and uneven. In the end, there isn’t a fabric but more of a moth-eaten bit of cheese cloth. Those that have woven this fabric foolishly think no one sees the holes. When others aren't looking, they pull and tug, stretch and fluff, desperately trying to smooth over, plump,and brighten the coarse bits of fray. They try to wrap themselves, but find only a fight with the other for warmth and protection. When one wins, the other loses. The fabric isn’t big enough for both. Both are left bitter, cold, shivering,and exposed to the elements.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)